Nov
24
Adventures of Pluto Nash, The – DivX Version (Normal Quality), DVD (Good Quality), PDA Version
November 24, 2009 | Tagged 2002, Action, Boyle Peter, Cleese John, Comedy, Guzman Luis, Mohr Jay, Murphy Eddie, Nunez Jr. Miguel A., Pantoliano Joe, Quaid Randy, Rebhorn James, Sci-Fi, Varnado Victor, Young Burt | Leave a Comment
|
IMDB rating: 3.70 Plot: After his successful night club is blown to flaming bits, Pluto and his band travel across the moon looking for clues as to who is behind the arson. Along with Bruno and Dina, Pluto visits a seedy motel, his secret hide out and the casino of the most powerful man on the moon searching for the evil doer, only to find out that the destruction of his club may have been his own fault |
Available versions:
DivX Version (Normal Quality), DVD (Good Quality), PDA Version
Actors: Cleese John,Murphy Eddie,Quaid Randy,Pantoliano Joe,Mohr Jay,Guzman Luis,Rebhorn James,Boyle Peter,Young Burt,Nunez Jr. Miguel A.,Varnado Victor,Action,Comedy,Sci-Fi,
Why are these films so succesive or failures?
Successful film’s:
Independent Day (1996)
Titanic (1997)
Star Wars (Episode 1)
Harry Potter and the philosophers stone (1999)
Spider man (2002)
Pirates of the Caribbean (2003)
———————–
Failure film’s:
Batman and Robin (1997)
Cut Throat Island (1995)
The Adventure of Pluto Nash (2002)
Town and Country (2001)
Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow (2004)
Alexander (2005)
Howard the Duke
Your question makes no sense.
For a start it’s ‘Independence Day’, and ‘Howard The Duck’.
As for why a film is a success or a failure, it’s all to do with marketing, and if the film is shite people won’t go to watch it.
douglas b | Jan 23, 2007
Well I can say that the reason why Spiderman was such a great succes was that it was stylish, well thought out, and that Peter Parker had many many flaws. Which makes for a Very Very good movie. Plus he wasn’t suave, he wasn’t really really incredible, he was a outcast…like the other 85% of the world is.
Vegas S | Jan 23, 2007
Because many of the successful films were based on a true story or on a book or even on a ride & because their is already scope on it, people want to see if it lives up to what it is based on!
sexi_beksi | Jan 23, 2007
You can’t compare them like that because they are completely different kind of movies. If you ask i.e. "why is spiderman successive but spiderman II a failure?" then somebody could answer that.
BryanB | Jan 23, 2007
Have you seen the movies ? The ones you listed under failure’s really sucked.
Shah | Jan 23, 2007
Successes: It’s a combination of a good story, great cast, and
insane marketing.
Failures: Really poor stories. Someone should have done
several script rewrites before making any of these
films. Hey Hollywood, give me $500 thousand and
I can write a piece of crap script.
Russell M | Jan 23, 2007
Well I thought Alexander was awful, I walked out of the theater shortly before it ened. I guess its do to the acting, the actors, and the marketing and special effects
Erika | Jan 26, 2007